GLOBAL EVENTS AND RBI ACTION TO DETERMINE MARKET SENTIMENTS

On Monday, March 23, 2009 10:54 by Sudip Bandyopadhyay
Posted in category Economic Times
No Comments            Add your Comment

What is the future for credit ratings agencies and how should they be treated under the new system of financial market regulation evolving internationally? These questions have been hotly debated in recent months and a consensus is now emerging. The European Union is close to finalizing legislation to register and regulate ratings firms for the first time in the region, and next month’s G20 meeting in London is expected to affirm the need for a globally coordinated approach to overseeing ratings agencies. The starting point for these reviews is recognition that credit ratings of certain recent structured securities have not performed well.  At the same time, investors and policymakers appreciate that ratings - a common and transparent language for evaluating and comparing creditworthiness - remain important to the efficient functioning of capital markets. They provide useful information to investors about credit risk and help companies and governments access capital. To achieve the aim of restoring confidence in ratings, regulation needs to be globally consistent, based on broadly accepted standards. First, regulators should focus on overseeing ratings firms’ policies and standards for managing potential conflicts of interest. Ratings opinions and methodologies, however, should be free from regulatory interference. Second, ratings firms should be subject to robust, periodic inspections by regulators to check they are complying with their processes and policies. If they are found not to be, they should be subject to regulatory sanction.  Regulation should require high levels of transparency about ratings methodologies, models and performance, to help investors compare ratings and form their own view of the soundness of the rating analysis.

The meaning and use of ratings should also be clear, including their limitations and the level of risk inherent in the rating. Ratings on new, complex securities should be differentiated and consideration should be given to requiring issuers of these securities to disclose publicly information about these transactions that is currently provided to ratings firms confidentially. Ratings agencies must be accountable to regulators, which would provide the market with assurance that the ratings process has integrity. That should be the case whatever their business model, as all models - whether investor-pays, issuer-pays or government-pays - carry potential conflicts of interest and different levels of transparency. Policymakers should encourage competition between groups with different business models and investors should be free to decide on the credibility of ratings agencies according to the quality, integrity and performance of their ratings. Finally, governments must look at how ratings are used by regulators and investors. If ratings are used as benchmarks of creditworthiness in regulations such as Basle II, other benchmarks should be considered as well. That would help avoid inadvertently encouraging investors to depend excessively on ratings, rather than treating them - as they should - as one of many inputs in decision making.

Indian Capital Markets during the last week continued to trade in a narrow range with a positive bias.  Both the Indices Nifty and the Sensex closed moderately higher by around 3% following strong sentiments witnessed in the global markets which resulted in continued unwinding of short positions in the local markets.  On the domestic front, the good news came mainly from the inflation front.  Inflation has now touched a new 20 year low of 0.44%.  Going ahead it looks likely that the Indian economy could see inflation getting negative.   Reflecting the tough economic environment, IMF in its recent forecast has commented that the Indian economy is slowing down and the outlook for the next year remains uncertain.  The IMF expects India’s GDP growth would slow to 6.3% in FY09 and to 5.3% in FY10.The pull-back rally witnessed last week was largely on the back of FIIs, who turned net ‘buyers’ after 19 successive sessions of ‘selling’.  Last week in four trading sessions from 13 Mar 09 to 18 Mar 09, FIIs bought securities worth 975 crs in cash segment.  They were also net buyers to the tune of more than Rs. 2000 crs in F&O segment.  This has squeezed out most of the ‘shorts’ in the market.

Markets are likely to turn ‘highly’ volatile in the coming week, which also is the ‘expiry week’ in the F&O segment.  Large build-up of positions is hence not expected to happen, in view of ‘uncertainty’ due to general elections.  FIIs ‘action’ and Global news-flow is likely to drive the markets in the coming week.  Market is also now expecting further monetary action from RBI very soon.  Expectations are building around cut in benchmark rates and even CRR and SLR.  Positive action by RBI on this front will definitely cheer up the market.
( ** this is the transcript of the weekly column I write for Economic Times )

No Comments            Add your Comment

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Add your Comment